Will California Leapfrog Ontario on Home Energy Ratings?

“Fantastic semi on a quiet cul-de-sac. Mechanicals and insulation completely updated by owner with geo-thermal system and radiant heat flooring. Home energy rating in top percentile. Close to schools and shopping.”

Imagine seeing a real estate listing like this that puts value on energy efficient homes and protects home buyers from sticker shock when they receive the second bill for their home purchase: the monthly utility bills.

This is one of many policy and financing recommendations in a new report from the California Clean Energy Fund (CalCEF). It ties home energy efficiency improvements to “trigger points” in a home’s financial life cycle, that is, at events such as the time of sale, renovation or when energy prices rise. The report provides a manual or roadmap for lenders and regulators on how to unlock energy efficiency at key points in the marketing and ownership of a home and makes suggestions about disclosure, enforcement, incentives and finance.

For time of sale, the report advocates mandated energy disclosure for seller and buyer, based on a standard asset rating scheme, and also suggests that home energy features be included in real estate MLS listings. According to the authors, these actions would make enormous inroads in creating awareness of efficiency, equalizing the knowledge basis of all buyers who purchase all sizes and types of homes, and protecting consumers.

In my most recent energy conservation report, Restoring Balance: A Review of the First Three Years of the Green Energy Act, I urged the Ontario government to take similar action to protect consumers by implementing one of the provisions contained in the Green Energy Act (GEA), passed by the Legislature three years ago. Acting on this commitment would allow Ontario to fulfill one of the objectives of the government’s Long-Term Energy Plan, which is to be a North American leader in energy efficiency.

CalCEF is proposing a novel approach to strengthening energy conservation in the residential sector – linking policy to the major milestones in the ownership of a property. In Ontario, we don’t have a comprehensive vision like this.  Instead, our limited action consists of a pilot home energy rating program run by Enbridge.  It is a commendable but rather piecemeal approach by one of the gas utilities. If California can act on a grander scale, so can we. Ontario can avoid being overtaken on this issue since we already have the statutory authority to act. Unless we are content to watch California lead the way for North America as it so often has on environmental issues associated with the use of energy.

2 thoughts on “Will California Leapfrog Ontario on Home Energy Ratings?

  1. The biggest problem with energy efficiency ratings for houses is the roller-coaster of the federal government’s on-again off-again programs. The standards, training, certification. and software for home energy efficiency ratings all come from the federal government, Ontario simply hooks programs on top of those ratings. In the past few years, federal energy efficiency programs were cancelled, then rebranded and repriced a year later, money got put in, taken out, topped up, allowed to expire, all without prior notice. As a result, energy efficiency firms are either laying off all their staff or else all their customers are madly scrambling to meet a new arbitrary deadline before the money is pulled.

    If the province made energy ratings mandatory, imagine trying to sell a house when all efficiency rating firms are bankrupt or fully booked for months scrambling to meet a federal deadline. The feds also changed the program so that rather than doing a full evaluation after renovations you are paid according to work done, not results achieved, and your house’s rating is the pre-renovation one.

    What is a province to do if the federal government can not be relied upon to have a stable home energy rating program?


  2. Pingback: How Much More Valuable is an Energy Efficient Home?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>